June 28, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Until recently, the Nuclear exploit kit (EK) was among the most prolific malware delivery systems worldwide. But according to Softpedia, April 30 marked the end of Nuclear exploit activity.

So what happened to the kit and its creators? Why did it stop working? And perhaps most importantly: What’s the fallout from Nuclear EK going dark?

Credit Where Credit Is Due

Just before the exploit kit went quiet, security software firm Check Point published a two-part analysis of the program detailing both its technical and financial operations. For example, the report noted that unlike most other EKs, would-be cybercriminals who purchase a Nuclear account didn’t get a username and password on the main exploit server. Instead, login details to the control panel are housed on a single, dedicated server.

A few weeks after the report was published, Nuclear activity fell off significantly. According to SC Magazine, the security company argued that its report prompted the sudden disappearance. Check Point’s data suggested that the kit’s creators were possibly of Russian origin and making around $100,000 per month — they may have simply decided the heightened scrutiny wasn’t worth it and retired with their cash.

They could have also chosen to shutter the doors and try something else; malware-makers typically prefer to innovate rather than stagnate. Whatever the reason, however, it seems Nuclear is nonexistent. So what’s next?

Mobile Moves for More Than Nuclear EK

It’s worth noting that around the same time Nuclear EK powered down, Angler also vanished; now the Neutrino EK, Magnitude, RIG and Sundown own the top four spots in the EK activity arena. But a shift in pecking order is only the beginning. Just like ransomware infections have evolved to include worm-like capabilities and cybercriminals are leveraging old attack vectors like macro malware, the exploit market is undergoing significant change.

Consider the rise of the Godless malware, which Trend Micro analyst Veo Zhang called “reminiscent of an exploit kit in that it uses an open-source rooting framework called android-rooting-tools.” Leveraging CVE-2015-3636 and CVE-2014-3153, Godless can infect almost 90 percent of all Android devices, making it the first of its kind — but certainly not the last.

This is Nuclear’s fallout: the development of new kits that use new distribution methods and attack new devices. While it’s always a net positive to know more about malware and shut down kit-makers, there’s a bit of Newton here. For every security action, there’s a cybercriminal reaction — but unlike classical physics, the results aren’t always easy to predict.

Final thoughts? Nuclear’s gone and Angler went with it. The EK landscape is changing, and while forcing one group of attackers into early retirement is never a bad thing, there’s always another upstart waiting in the wings.

More from

FYSA – Adobe Cold Fusion Path Traversal Vulnerability

2 min read - Summary Adobe has released a security bulletin (APSB24-107) addressing an arbitrary file system read vulnerability in ColdFusion, a web application server. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-53961, can be exploited to read arbitrary files on the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data exposure. Threat Topography Threat Type: Arbitrary File System Read Industries Impacted: Technology, Software, and Web Development Geolocation: Global Environment Impact: Web servers running ColdFusion 2021 and 2023 are vulnerable Overview X-Force Incident Command is monitoring the disclosure…

What does resilience in the cyber world look like in 2025 and beyond?

6 min read -  Back in 2021, we ran a series called “A Journey in Organizational Resilience.” These issues of this series remain applicable today and, in many cases, are more important than ever, given the rapid changes of the last few years. But the term "resilience" can be difficult to define, and when we define it, we may limit its scope, missing the big picture.In the age of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), the prevalence of breach data from infostealers and the near-constant…

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today