February 27, 2017 By Mark Samuels 2 min read

Google’s announcement of the first-ever collision attack means the Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA-1) is officially dead, according to a report from Bleeping Computer.

SHA-1 is a cryptographic function that generates hashes for digital data. These hashes should be unique and help prove the identity of a file. However, the successful collision attack undermines that uniqueness, and the algorithm can thus no longer be considered secure.

The demise of SHA-1, which was designed by the United States National Security Agency several decades ago, creates significant implications for businesses that rely on the algorithm for the delivery of files across the web. Technology companies should work to move from SHA-1 as soon as possible.

How Did Google Run the Attack?

This successful attack marks the conclusion of two years’ research between Google and the CWI Institute in Amsterdam. In a blog post, Google noted how CWI researcher Marc Stevens published an initial theoretical paper on SHA-1 collision in 2013.

The blog post explains researchers had to overcome some considerable challenges to build a theoretical collision attack in practice. As many as 6,500 years of CPU computation were required to complete the first phase of attack, and 110 years of GPU computation for the second phase. During these phases, researchers ran more than 9 quintillion different SHA-1 computations in total.

As proof of the attack, Google released two PDFs with identical SHA-1 hashes but different content.

What Is a Collision Attack and Why Does It Matter?

A collision occurs when two distinct pieces of data, such as a document or website certificate, produce a hash with the same number value. Collisions should, in theory, never occur for secure hash functions.

However, experts have long believed a well-funded attacker could craft a collision in a flawed algorithm, such as SHA-1. Google’s research proved this flaw and demonstrates how an attacker could use a collision attack to replace one file with another.

An errant individual or third party, for example, could use two colliding contracts to trick another party into digitally signing a higher-value contract. The seller could later claim the purchaser signed a contract with drastically different terms and a much higher price.

What Should Businesses and IT Managers Do Now?

The demise of the algorithm comes at a time when many organizations still rely on SHA-1. Estimates suggest thousands of software packages could use SHA-1 to ensure the safe installation and update of files distributed over the web.

Google says its research highlights how the IT industry must break its reliance on SHA-1. The source code for performing the collision attack on SHA-1 will be published in 90 days.

Stevens told Ars Technica that any individual or business still using SHA-1 should look to move to a safer standard before real-world attacks take place. He suggested that continued growth in computational power means it will become cheaper and easier to run such attacks.

Security Intelligence reported late last year how major technology firms such as Microsoft and Mozilla would stop accepting outdated certificates. In its blog post announcing the collision attack, Google suggests businesses should urgently move from SHA-1 to safer alternatives such as SHA-256.

More from

FYSA – Adobe Cold Fusion Path Traversal Vulnerability

2 min read - Summary Adobe has released a security bulletin (APSB24-107) addressing an arbitrary file system read vulnerability in ColdFusion, a web application server. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-53961, can be exploited to read arbitrary files on the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data exposure. Threat Topography Threat Type: Arbitrary File System Read Industries Impacted: Technology, Software, and Web Development Geolocation: Global Environment Impact: Web servers running ColdFusion 2021 and 2023 are vulnerable Overview X-Force Incident Command is monitoring the disclosure…

What does resilience in the cyber world look like in 2025 and beyond?

6 min read -  Back in 2021, we ran a series called “A Journey in Organizational Resilience.” These issues of this series remain applicable today and, in many cases, are more important than ever, given the rapid changes of the last few years. But the term "resilience" can be difficult to define, and when we define it, we may limit its scope, missing the big picture.In the age of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), the prevalence of breach data from infostealers and the near-constant…

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today